2026 forecast
Iowa Senate forecast
Josh Turek vs Ashley Hinson, an open seat. The model has Turek ahead by 1.3 points, winning 59 percent of 10,000 simulated elections.
County simulation
99 countiesD +40R +40Hover a county for the simulated vote
Every simulated outcome
10,000 sims80 percent of simulations fall between D +8.0 and R +5.3. Negative margins are Democratic wins.
Polls of the race
Full average| Pollster | Sample | Age | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnPoint average | LOWESS Election Day projection | D +0.1 | |
| Emerson College/Nexstar Media | 650 LV | 3d | R +0.7 |
| CNN/SSRS | 801 LV | 4d | R +3.0 |
| Suffolk University | 500 LV | 5d | D +3.2 |
| New York Times/Siena | 606 LV | 8d | R +1.3 |
| Rasmussen Reports (R) | 1,028 LV | 9d | D +5.1 |
| Quantus Insights | 714 LV | 10d | R +0.1 |
| Fox News/Beacon Research and Shaw & Company | 1,008 LV | 11d | D +1.4 |
| Big Data Poll | 650 RV | 16d | D +4.2 |
| InsiderAdvantage | 1,200 LV | 16d | D +1.7 |
| Marist College | 1,050 RV | 19d | D +5.5 |
| Trafalgar Group (R) | 1,089 LV | 21d | R +0.7 |
| co/efficient (R) | 831 LV | 23d | R +0.7 |
| Cygnal (R) | 500 LV | 28d | D +1.3 |
| Rasmussen Reports (R) | 1,031 LV | 29d | D +6.1 |
| YouGov | 2,041 LV | 31d | D +3.1 |
| Emerson College | 750 LV | 38d | R +3.7 |
| Global Strategy Group (D) | 800 LV | 39d | D +2.2 |
| Wedgewood Polls | 600 LV | 41d | R +0.8 |
| Abacus Data | 323 LV | 42d | D +7.5 |
| Suffolk University | 500 LV | 47d | R +5.1 |
| Emerson College | 712 LV | 66d | R +1.7 |
| Beacon Research and Shaw & Co. Research bipartisan | 1,003 RV | 104d | D +3.7 |
| New York Times/Siena University | 600 LV | 104d | R +2.3 |
| Cygnal (R) | 600 LV | 112d | R +0.6 |
| Global Strategy Group (D) | 1,000 LV | 120d | D +0.1 |
Estimated vote by group
model crosstabs| Group | Share | Turek | Hinson |
|---|---|---|---|
| GenderMen | 46% | 44.6 | 53.4 |
| Women | 54% | 54.0 | 44.0 |
| Age18 to 29 | 15% | 55.1 | 42.8 |
| 30 to 44 | 22% | 49.8 | 48.2 |
| 45 to 64 | 32% | 46.3 | 51.7 |
| 65+ | 31% | 50.3 | 47.6 |
| RaceWhite | 90% | 46.7 | 51.3 |
| Black | 3% | 89.1 | 9.0 |
| Latino | 3% | 66.9 | 31.1 |
| Asian and other | 4% | 77.5 | 20.1 |
| Race and genderWhite men | 41% | 40.8 | 57.2 |
| White women | 49% | 51.6 | 46.3 |
| Black men | 1% | 87.0 | 11.1 |
| Black women | 2% | 91.0 | 7.1 |
| Latino men | 2% | 64.9 | 33.0 |
| Latino women | 2% | 68.9 | 29.1 |
| All other races | 4% | 77.5 | 20.1 |